A follow-up status of two significant derelict vessels, both of which were removed from the harbor last week.

I am pleased to report that “New Beginnings”, a 1972 Hatteras 56’, which was known as a problematic vessel in several Southern California harbors, was dismantled and removed from Newport Harbor last Friday, January 16th.  During its dubious final stay in Newport Harbor, it racked up more than $50K in fines and fees.  The cost to have the vessel and its hazardous contents removed was more than $30K.  It’s unlikely another harbor would have dealt with this situation as swiftly and completely as we have.  Other harbors don’t have the laws/codes, resources, and focus on the potential for situations like this to devolve so thoroughly. 

New Beginnings - Dismantled

New Beginnings – Dismantled

The vessel “Haven” was also removed permanently from the harbor last week after a lengthy and complicated stay.

A foreign owner purchased the vessel about a year ago with the best of intentions for having it transported to a lake near his home in Europe and then undertaking a restoration.

Unfortunately, the owner was unfamiliar with many of the challenges associated with such a project, including but not limited to:

  • How a 60+ year old, 40’ wooden boat could be transported internationally
  • The boat yard that handled the inspection and was keeping the boat until transport arrived wanted to be paid and the boat removed so the space could be freed up for other work
    • Aside:  the boat yard eventually asked the Harbor Department to execute an impound to have the vessel removed from their premises
  • There were costs associated with continuing to store the boat here in Newport Harbor, as arrangements were made to transport it
  • Registration and insurance requirements associated with storing a boat in Newport Harbor
  • Operability requirements associated with storing a boat in Newport Harbor

All this to say, the owner quickly gave up on the project and left the situation for us to deal with.

In this case, we were able to recoup a portion of the costs for removal and destruction from the owner who abandoned the vessel. 

There is one other significant vessel in our sights at the moment.  The boat is in impound with us, and we have just initiated the process to declare the boat abandoned.

The registered owner has claimed for several months that he is prepared to retrieve it and have it brought into compliance with harbor requirements.

However, the boat yard with which he has been in negotiations just last week informed us they are no longer willing to do business with the owner.

We will move forward as quickly as legally allowed with the eventual removal of this vessel as well.

Warm regards,

Paul Blank

Harbormaster
Harbor Department
City of Newport Beach

2023 was a busy and productive year for the City of Newport Beach, thanks to strong leadership and our extremely professional staff.

We have been working diligently to increase public safety, address quality-of-life issues, and make strategic investments to further improve our great city.

Here’s a look at some of our 2023 successes:

The City of Newport Beach has introduced a new license program offering 16 onshore and offshore City-owned moorings to the public in a variety of sizes. Applications for the initial licenses will be accepted through March 1, 2024.

The new program is designed for vessel owners to lease moorings long-term without having to acquire a permit, sub-permit or mooring equipment.

Monthly fees will be charged based on the size of the mooring, starting at $162 a month for an 18-ft. mooring. There is no cost to apply for one of the 16 new mooring leases.

Siyamak sits down with Seymour Beek, president of Balboa Island Ferry, one of Southern California’s oldest family-owned businesses. Today he will discuss the new rules in California aimed at reducing emissions and how they will impact small businesses.

“CARB made a rule that all short run fairies in California had to be zero emission by 2026. We consume an average of 26 gallons of fuel a day. You’re not gonna save the world by making us go zero emission,” Mr. Beek said. “They haven’t really examined the consequences of the rules they’re making. It’s extremely challenging, extremely expensive.”