Balboa Marina and Public Docks Get Final OK
Source: Stu News Newport Balboa Marina and public docks get final OK
A project for new public docks and improvements to an existing private marina that’s been in the works for about a decade received unanimous county approval this week.
The Orange County Board of Supervisors voted 5-0 Tuesday (Dec. 20) in favor of a lease agreement with The Irvine Company for construction of public docks in county tidelands property at 201 East Coast Highway. The county tidelands aren’t currently used and there is no direct access to the shore as the water between county tidelands and the shore is controlled by TIC.
The entire project (previously approved by the city and the California Coastal Commission) entails landside and waterside development, including improvements and expansion to the existing facilities at Balboa Marina, a new restaurant, and a redesigned parking lot.
On Tuesday, the OC supervisors only considered the county tidelands where some of the slips are located, not the entire project. Their action also included approval of a lease agreement with the city of Newport Beach and a resolution finding the county tidelands property as exempt surplus land.
The marina and public docks project in Lower Newport Bay, just south of where Pacific Coast Highway crosses the bay, will increase public access to recreational opportunities, supervisors agreed.
The project is a great deal for the county and the public at large, said Supervisor Lisa Bartlett, whose recently redrawn district now covers Newport Beach. The Irvine Company will bear the entire multi-million cost and obtain the necessary permits.
“The project will provide public benefit boat slips, side tie slips, that do not exist today,” she said. “Additionally, the county will receive consistent, incremental monthly revenue based on a market rate study.”
BOS Vice Chair Don Wagner, who previously represented Newport Beach during his time as a California State Assemblyman, was happy to see the project before them in its final steps after so many years.
“This is a long-standing project and it is great to be able to see it come to fruition,” Wagner said. “My hat’s off to everybody who’s gotten this done.”
“It is a testament, I think, to the way government ought to be done,” with the county, city and private entities working together and bringing something to the public that is very much wanted and needed, he added.
Plans include construction of a public dock consisting of 12 no-cost public use side ties (seven are located in approximately 7,436 square feet of county tidelands, which is the reason the project needed county approval). Once construction is complete, TIC will donate ownership of the public dock to the City of Newport Beach. The city will manage the maintenance and operations of the public dock.
The Irvine Company will also add 26 private boat slips, of which will be five full slips and two partial slips.
Under the option agreement, TIC must pay an option fee of $10,000 to the county upon the approval. The option term is for 12 months. Should TIC need more time to satisfy all of the conditions, an option to extend the term for an additional 12-month period is included in the agreement.
The agreement also requires that TIC pay the county a monthly rent of $3,500. The rent will be automatically adjusted by 3% every three years. Every 10 years, the rent will adjust by the greater of fair market rent or proportionate changes in the Consumer Price Index (10-year revision). Rent under the lease will not decrease and any rent increases under the 10-year revision will be capped at 5%.
The term for the TIC lease is 30 years and has an option to extend for one 15-year period. At no time shall the lease exceed the maximum lease term of 50 years as authorized in the tidelands grant.
The project has predated Newport Beach Mayor Noah Blom by many years, he said during public comment at the OC Board of Supervisors meeting on Tuesday.
Newport Beach City Council initially heard a conceptual review of the project in March 2012. The council unanimously approved the project in December 2014.
In February 2017, the California Coastal Commission unanimously approved the project with 17 special conditions that focused on protecting sensitive animal and plant species, and public access.
In 2016, The Irvine Company approached the county to negotiate use of county tidelands for the project. After conducting CEQA mitigation work, TIC contacted the county again in August.
The portion of the project on the supervisors’ agenda on Tuesday were the seven slips on county jurisdiction and the costs associated with that, Blom said.
“We’ve kind of hit a hang-up where we’re looking to really finalize this project and I think 10 years is a decent amount of time to build a few boat slips,” Blom said. “More so than that, I think this is a great element for the county. We are greatly underserved in that section of Newport.”
There is no public dock space available near that location, he added.
This is something The Irvine Company will take on at their own expense, but will be used by all county residents and visitors to the harbor, he noted.
It’s something the community has really been pushing for, Blom said.
“The city asks that you look forward to making this a reality after 10 years on the drawing board so that we can get more public access down there, get more people from the county enjoying our harbor,” Blom said. “I think that’s the goal for all of us. It’s a win-win public-private partnership.”
During the supervisors’ discussion of the item, County Counsel Leon Page announced an amendment to the lease with the city proposed by Supervisor Katrina Foley. The change would require the city, in addition to its obligations to the Americans with Disabilities Act, to also provide disabled members of the public with access to a wheelchair lift so they can board boats.
Foley, whose district covered Newport Beach before being redrawn and recently won re-election for the new district five, which now includes NB, recalled a meeting with city officials who agreed to the additional terms, she said. The city has a wheelchair lift at Marina Park, which is likely similar to what they’ll use at Balboa Marina. The problem with a permanent structure is that kids might use it as a recreational amenity and it would be hard to ensure that its maintained, Foley noted.
The drafted language in the amendment incorporates that agreement, she said.
Bartlett included the wheelchair lift amendment to her motion, which was ultimately approved.
Foley also commented that after the project was continued from the previously scheduled December 6 meeting, her team researched the details of the agreement.
“Since that time, we’ve worked pretty diligently to try to understand the project, try to understand how the county came up with rate, to understand where the rate formula was derived from,” Foley said. “What we’ve gathered is that there was a 2016 Newport Beach appraisal that was done for a different set of docks, not related to this set of docks, and so that formed the basis for a discussion about the valuation.”
There was no updated appraisal conducted, she added.
“The county doesn’t actually have a rate system,” for usage of the tidelands, Foley explained, pointing out the system that Newport Beach uses is posted online. “We don’t have anything like that, this was just individually negotiated with The Irvine Company.”
Although Foley’s concerns and comparisons were geared more toward application on future negotiations and potential lease agreements rather than the current deal. She isn’t sure what method would work best to calculate the tidelands rate system, but she looks forward to working on improving the method.
“I’m not sure what’s the best, a fixed rate or a gross receipts rate, but what I do know is that we don’t have a current system in place at the county so that it’s the same for everyone,” Foley said. “I hope that in the future we could come up with a rate system that’s fair.”
She noted the changes in the rental rate that occurred during negotiations.
The first amount that the county put forward was $5,500 per month. It was somehow whittled down to $2,500 a month and then that changed to $3,500 month
“It just seems like it was very arbitrary,” she said.
It’s “obvious” why we went from $5,500 to $2,500 to $3,500, Wagner replied.
“That’s called negotiations and that’s what happens when you are negotiating an agreement behind the scenes,” Wagner said. “The problem is we’re here; it sounds like now (we’re) trying to negotiate an additional change in public and, more importantly, without necessarily hearing from the other side as to whether this is acceptable or not.”
Shawna Schaffner, CEO of CAA Planning, Inc., representing TIC commented and confirmed they are aware of the amendments, both the addition of ADA access to a wheelchair lift at the public dock and the increased rent at the private slips.
“We find those amendments acceptable,” she said.
Foley also pointed out that the county entered into a similar agreement for 50 slips nearby the current project and the lease is more than $6,000 for those.
Although a different leaseholder owns those 50 slips, Bartlett pointed out, and, like real estate, location matters. Those 50 slips are in a prime location where the market rate would naturally be higher, while the slips under consideration by the supervisors aren’t in an ideal spot, she explained.
Considering everything in its entirety, including market rate for that particular location, the real estate department did fine job and it makes a lot of sense, Bartlett said.
Sara Hall covers City Hall and is a regular contributor to Stu News Newport.
Source: Stu News Newport Balboa Marina and public docks get final OK
Share this entry
By Laylan Connelly – Orange County Register
Officials have secured $8.3 million to dredge Newport Harbor in the $14 billion Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, but sand replenishment projects for two stretches of Orange County coastline were not included.
U.S. Rep. Michelle Steel said dredging of Newport Beach’s harbor is long overdue in her announcement Wednesday, Jan. 19, about the federal funding, but also stressed the need for added sand along the coastline. Funding for the Surfside-Sunset Replenishment Project, which would seed beaches through Huntington Beach south to Newport Beach will have to hope for final approval from another Congressional appropriations bill, the timeline of which has been unclear.
So is the San Clemente Shoreline Project, which would replenish beaches in the southern city, including improving the buffer of shoreline along a key coastal rail line.
Both projects have been stalled for years, awaiting funding for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to do the replenishments that help create a beach buffer that would protect roads, homes and infrastructure from ocean flooding, as well as keep beaches – one of the region’s major tourism draws – from disappearing.
In 1962, Congress passed the Rivers and Harbors Act, which required the Army Corps of Engineers to address the impacts of the constructed flood control structures on the sand deposits that should be happening naturally along shorelines.
The $23 million Surfside-Sunset project – $15.5 million in federal money and $7.63 from local agencies – would add 1.75 million cubic yards of sand to Surfside, which would then be pushed down the coast by ocean currents and waves, spreading it 12 miles south to Newport Beach.
The last time sand was added was 2010 – previously the replenishment happened every five to seven years.
“There is more work to do, and I will continue to demand action from the administration and the Army Corps to fully fund the Surfside-Sunset Replenishment Project because we are one natural disaster away from devastation,” Steel said in a statement.
San Clemente has been waiting about two decades for its big replenishment project. The city two years ago received a boost in the amount of $500,000 in federal funding for the design phase.
With no beach left, a wave crashes against the rocks and stairs just below the railroad tracks at North Beach in San Clemente on Wednesday, October 20, 2021.(Photo by Mark Rightmire, Orange County Register/SCNG)
The project would add 251,000 cubic yards of sand from Linda Lane beach to T-Street beach south of the pier. The sand has shrunk so much there in recent years, city leaders have discussed the possibly of moving San Clemente’s Marine Safety Headquarters off the beach. When big surf hits, the surf laps onto the railroad tracks.
About $9.3 million was requested in the bipartisan infrastructure bill by U.S. Rep. Mike Levin for the San Clemente Shoreline Project.
Levin helped secure $30.5 million in federal funding for the Encinitas-Solana Beach Coastal Storm Damage Reduction Project and $1.8 million for the Oceanside Special Shoreline Study, his office announced Wednesday.
The Encinitas-Solana Beach project involves placing 700,000 cubic yards of sand along 7,200 feet of beach in Solana Beach and 340,000 cubic yards of sand along 7,800 feet of beach in Encinitas.
The Oceanside shoreline study will create a plan to mitigate erosion and other effects from the construction of Camp Pendleton Harbor and will restore beach conditions along the affected shores to the conditions that existed before its development.
Levin’s office said he is also “continuing to fight to finalize federal funding for the San Clemente Shoreline Project.”
By Amy Senk
Corona del Mar resident Paul Blank was named Newport Beach Harbormaster last spring, a grand achievement to cap off an on-the-water lifestyle that began at age 10 with a two-week sailing class offered through the city’s recreation department. The harbormaster’s job is typically described as being a lead ambassador for Newport Harbor, one of the largest recreational harbors in the country, and includes overseeing a dozen or so employees and an annual budget of $1 million-plus. But like most things in the past year or so, the first several months have been filled with surprises. I caught up with him to learn more.
Q: What role did you play as harbormaster in the days after the oil spill, and what stands out in your mind now as the most notable thing that happened?
A: The response to the Amplify Energy Oil spill in early October was swift and multifaceted. My specific roles included surveying the harbor beaches for oil contamination, monitoring the harbor entrance for potential intrusion or contamination and participation in the City of Newport Beach Emergency Operations Center, which integrated with the Unified Command Response managed by the U.S. Coast Guard. A huge amount of my time was spent communicating my findings to others in the EOC and the UCR as well as with Harbor constituents and my patrol team in the Harbor Department. When the decision was made to close the harbor entrance, I was there to witness it and then established a patrol presence to advise mariners in a firm but friendly way of the closure and alternatives while they were unable to get in or out of the harbor. As the situation evolved, my role shifted into advising mariners, local businesses and residents where they could go for support or to file claims for loss or damage sustained as a result of the spill. I also spent considerable time and effort supporting the vessel decontamination site that was established at Marina Park. I am thankful that through the duration of the crisis, we were not forced to close or curtail activities on the harbor. Sailing classes, races, rowing, paddle boarding and casual harbor cruising all continued even though the entrance was closed. While not everyone could engage in all the activities they may have wished to while the entrance was closed, the harbor remained clean, safe and well enjoyed.
Q: We keep seeing mega yachts off the coast of Newport Beach. Have they caused any problems?
A: Newport Harbor has become a more popular port of call for mega yachts this year. Some vessels choose to enjoy anchorage off Big Corona Beach for their visits. Others have stopped there while waiting for a favorable tide to enter and transit the harbor. I am pleased to have made the process of reserving and making use of the Large Vessel Anchorage easier for the yacht managers. I am also pleased with the tenor and tone of the dialogue that continues with nearby residents and businesses. Concerns remain about traffic and congestion in that part of the harbor, but no negative impacts have been observed or reported to me. Newport Harbor is a “no-discharge harbor,” meaning no waste or refuse may go overboard. All vessels mooring or anchoring in Newport Harbor, including these mega yachts with dozens of paid, professional crews, are subject to dye-tab testing of their marine sanitation systems. This is the method we use to test the integrity of the vessel’s plumbing and waste holding tank. One vessel was tested upon arrival recently and didn’t pass. We allowed the crew an opportunity to check the settings on all their pumps and valves. A little less than an hour later we returned to re-test and the vessel passed. No pollution or waste was discharged into the bay in that first test, so no citation was issued, and the vessel was welcome to stay in the harbor. If any vessel is subsequently witnessed discharging into the bay, citations are written which come with a financial penalty and the vessel may be asked to leave the harbor. Thankfully it doesn’t happen very often.
Q: What is the Take Back Our Harbor movement, and what are your thoughts about it?
A: Take Back Our Harbor is the tagline for the newly formed Newport Harbor Foundation. The Foundation is a nonprofit group with a mission similar to the Newport Bay Conservancy. While the Newport Bay Conservancy is focused exclusively on improving Upper Newport Bay –essentially everything north of the PCH Bridge – the Newport Harbor Foundation is focused on preserving and improving the lower Newport Harbor. While I am not directly involved with the group, I am supportive of their mission. The group’s efforts align nicely with the Harbor Department’s goal of keeping the harbor clean, safe and well enjoyed.
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!